Pages

Jump to bottom

10 comments

1 freetoken  Sun, Feb 27, 2011 12:30:47am

Various links with comments on this issue which I compiled in the wee hours of the morn:

[Link: littlegreenfootballs.com...]
[Link: littlegreenfootballs.com...]
[Link: littlegreenfootballs.com...]

2 freetoken  Sun, Feb 27, 2011 1:32:15am

The name seemed to ring a bell... so I've done a bit more digging.

Bundgaard has history.

Boy, does he have history.

He's a convicted thief:
[Link: webcache.googleusercontent.com...]

He's buddies with the Falcones:
[Link: webcache.googleusercontent.com...]

Has a long running stance against social programs:

It was very wise for us to be... to be cutting taxes, because the government should only be using as much money as it needs to exist. By sending money back to the people, that is money that we are not going to be able to spend. Had we not handed over a billion dollars in tax cuts back to the taxpayers in Arizona, that's another $1 billion we would be obligated to find a way to pay for because that money would have invariably been spent on social programs.

Coincidentally, during his break in public service after the above service geared towards eliminating taxes, he found himself in the employ of JP Morgan to:

[...] help corporations and high-net-worth individuals use Like-Kind Exchanges to manage their tax liabilities. [...] "Scott's experience in government, real estate and financing makes him a terrific addition to our JPMorgan team," said Christopher Yebuah, president of J.P. Morgan Property Exchange Inc.


Now, I'm not saying that a young man who gets involved in crime ought not to be given a second chance. Or that someone who finds themselves in a violent relationship ought not to be allowed some sympathy.

However, in the case of Bundgaard we have someone who:
Is a convicted thief;
Is friends with notorious international arms dealing family;
Spent his entire political career pushing the elimination of state services;
Now Sponsors numerous xenophobic legislation;
Who, finally, after being in a physical fight with his girlfriend to the point that law enforcement had to be brought in on the matter declares that "There was no ‘domestic violence.' "

There's a pattern here.

Not unlike how Beck continues his escapism (now through hyper-religion as opposed to illicit drugs), Bundgaard continues his pattern of blindness to his own (significant) moral flaws.

No wonder the racist wingnuts of AZ love him. Just as they are blind to Bundgaard's characterological flaws they are blind to their own racism and hate.

3 Obdicut  Sun, Feb 27, 2011 6:47:55am
"I had no choice but to pull her from the driver's seat, which resulted in marks on her knees," Bundgaard said.

This makes no sense. Why didn't he have any choice? Why did he have to assault her?

4 Romantic Heretic  Sun, Feb 27, 2011 7:28:41am

It's always amusing to see the 'law'n'order' excuse why the law doesn't apply to them.

5 Ogami Itto  Sun, Feb 27, 2011 8:10:39am

Interesting that Bundgaard didn't waive his "legislative immunity" at the time of the arrest, but rather later through a press release.

6 Our Precious Bodily Fluids  Sun, Feb 27, 2011 9:12:34am

re: #2 freetoken

The name seemed to ring a bell... so I've done a bit more digging.

He's buddies with the Falcones:

I thought some insane billionaire joined joined weird ninja cult out in the ass-end of China for several years and then came back & took care of Falcone.

Image: Y95oa.jpg

7 Gus  Sun, Feb 27, 2011 10:42:33am

A couple of things come to mind.

You know how they're always railing on diplomatic immunity especially around the UN.

The other being, what about taking "personal responsibility"?

8 HappyWarrior  Sun, Feb 27, 2011 10:54:46am

re: #4 Romantic Heretic

It's always amusing to see the 'law'n'order' excuse why the law doesn't apply to them.

It's like "personal responsibility" in that way.

9 moderatelyradicalliberal  Sun, Feb 27, 2011 11:31:58am

At least she gave the bastard a black eye and a fat lip.

10 Prononymous, rogue demon hunter  Sun, Feb 27, 2011 3:20:20pm

re: #2 freetoken

re: #3 Obdicut

re: #5 Ogami Itto

After reading the article I was going to say something about understanding wanting to avoid the damage that the walk of shame can do, and that there aren't enough details yet about the altercation to really pin fault. But after reading the cogent points above, no sympathy. I hope she sues him.


This page has been archived.
Comments are closed.

Jump to top

Create a PageThis is the LGF Pages posting bookmarklet. To use it, drag this button to your browser's bookmark bar, and title it 'LGF Pages' (or whatever you like). Then browse to a site you want to post, select some text on the page to use for a quote, click the bookmarklet, and the Pages posting window will appear with the title, text, and any embedded video or audio files already filled in, ready to go.
Or... you can just click this button to open the Pages posting window right away.
Last updated: 2023-04-04 11:11 am PDT
LGF User's Guide RSS Feeds

Help support Little Green Footballs!

Subscribe now for ad-free access!Register and sign in to a free LGF account before subscribing, and your ad-free access will be automatically enabled.

Donate with
PayPal
Cash.app
Recent PagesClick to refresh